Jim Bianco Predictions
President of Bianco Research
Track Jim Bianco's public market predictions and forecast accuracy. Each prediction is recorded from the date it was published to its estimated deadline, then graded correct or wrong based on the outcome.
- Rankings only reflect predictions tracked on this site and do not represent a predictor's full record.
- Grading involves judgment and may not always be clear-cut.
- Submit corrections
See quote
[2:33] I think that they're going to go up. I think the Fed is going to be raising rates at least one time, probably October at this point.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[3:19] I think that we're probably going to see the 10-year yield, which is around a little under 450 right now, around 442 or so. It's probably going to trend towards 5%, I think, by the end of the year.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[21:59] I'm actually pretty bullish on the AI sector um right now. And I still think that there's some room for those stocks to run.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[12:08] For those that talk about in you know technology with AI is going to be deflationary that you know we we're in a long-term deflationary pull. That's over. That is over. This is a different inflation cycle. You cannot expect us to go back to that other cycle that we had from 2010 to 2020 because we're not showing any indications of that. And now we're starting to move back up with inflation again.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[4:21] They'll follow to some degree. Uh, but I do think you'll see cur the yield curve flatten. In other words, short-term interest rates will go up faster than long-term interest rates.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[8:05] We don't have but a couple of more weeks, maybe a month that we could keep doing that before the the cumulative impact of the straight being closed is going to lead to real supply constraints in the oil market.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
The Strait of Hormuz was effectively closed from early March 2026, and by the prediction's target date of June 20, the IEA confirmed cumulative supply losses exceeding 1 billion barrels with over 14 mb/d shut in — the largest supply disruption in oil market history. Real supply constraints clearly materialized well within the predicted timeframe. (https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-may-2026)
See quote
[14:06] I personally don't think he believes those anymore and that he'll moderate to a more of a neutral stance. And that's where I think we're going to be for the next several months.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[13:31] I don't think they're going to hike at that meeting.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
The Fed voted unanimously 12-0 to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50%–3.75% at its June 17, 2026 meeting, confirming the prediction was correct. No rate hike occurred at that meeting. (https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260617a.htm)
See quote
[25:09] I do think rates will continue to move higher. I don't think I'm at the point where I'm going to say that we're at imminent risk of breaking something. That could be later, but not right now.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[26:30] Will there be a recession? Yes. But where will that recession be? It'll be in the rest of the world. Okay, good. It's not in the US.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[32:44] I don't necessarily think that the dollar will rally from here. It could actually, you know, continue to turn sideways to lower. That's the way I think it's going to go.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[38:15] investors are saying yes, but in a year or 18 months, will you be able to say that? And the answer we think as investors is no, you can't. The massive disruption is coming.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[39:03] So since it is a technological disruption, I'm going to argue no, I don't think it's going to be a systemic problem.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[0:08] I think we're going to take out $50 for the first time in silver's history and we're probably going to keep moving higher. It's go to 75 or 100.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[19:41] what should you expect stocks to return you over the next say 5 to 10 years about 6%.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[32:31] I'll contradict myself in that what's got the momentum and the momentum is precious metals and AI stocks. So that you know you said the last quarter that's two months to 3 months to four months. They probably will continue to be the best performers.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
The prediction claimed precious metals would be 'the best performing assets' through the target period. Gold (GC=F) returned +7.6% while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) returned -1.0%, confirming precious metals outperformed equities as the best performer during the prediction window.
See quote
[1:01] I actually think they are right and I actually do think inflation is coming. Uh and I'm talking about over the next few months because of tariffs.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
CPI rose from 2.7% year-over-year in June 2025 to 3.0% by September 2025, with NBER research confirming tariffs boosted the U.S. Inflation Rate by approximately 0.7 percentage points between March and August 2025. (https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0301)
See quote
[5:36] The 10 year and 30-year, I think they'll punch through 5%. That's my expectation, but not maybe by the end of the summer.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
The prediction claimed 10-year Treasury yields would 'punch through 5%', but the period high was only $4.49 (4.49%) on 2025-07-17, which fell short of the 5% target by 51 basis points, so the specific claim was not met.
See quote
[19:01] I've been terming these the four, five, six markets that over the next several years, cash will return you 4%, bonds will return you around five, and stocks because of their high valuation will return you around six.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
See quote
[20:04] That's why I think people are rotating into Europe? Because European stocks have so badly underperformed US stocks for many, many years. They've got very good relative valuations.
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
The prediction claimed European stocks (EZU) would outperform US stocks (^GSPC), but EZU gained 13.3% while ^GSPC gained 14.7% over the period, meaning US stocks outperformed Europe contrary to the prediction.
See quote
[24:20] Oh, I think that, you know, for the end of the year, for the next 6 months, I think that all the safe plays are going to be probably the play to go with. It's going to be energy, it's going to be gold
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
XLE underperformed the general market
See quote
[24:20] Oh, I think that, you know, for the end of the year, for the next 6 months, I think that all the safe plays are going to be probably the play to go with. It's going to be energy, it's going to be gold
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
Gold (GC=F) returned 29.5% over the 6-month period while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) returned 14.5%, meaning gold outperformed the stock market benchmark by a significant margin, matching the bullish prediction that gold would be 'the play to go with' as a safe play.
See quote
[25:31] I think at the least right now are probably the most overvalued companies and I'm going to point towards the Mag Seven right now. You've got, you know, the Mag Seven have got to see lots of things going right
Extracted by AI from a YouTube transcript. May be inaccurate or missing context. Verify via source. Send a correction.
The prediction claimed Magnificent Seven stocks would underperform due to high valuations. QQQ (Nasdaq-100, heavily weighted toward Mag Seven) returned 17% versus S&P 500's 14.7%, meaning the Mag Seven actually outperformed the broader market during the prediction period, directly contradicting the bearish underperformance claim.